:)
http://smashmethod.deviantart.com/art/Fundamental-Religion-8913379
A totally truthful (with the occasional lie) account of the life, beliefs, points-of-interest, ramblings and occasional inspired thought of a guy with too much time on his hands.
:)
http://smashmethod.deviantart.com/art/Fundamental-Religion-8913379
:D
:D
http://sweetaddiction.deviantart.com/art/pianos-and-pies-please-6428662
This woman is the reason I shouldn't read the Daily Mail, even if it is the only newspaper left in the dining room.
Cut down to its basic message, the article is telling us that the girls became prostitutes because of heroin, they got hooked on heroin because of cannabis and therefore cannabis is what killed them.
Let us ignore the fact that this woman is using a terrible tragedy to push some kind of personal anti-drug message, with only a very loose connection to the original story. Let us ignore the rudeness and ignorance in that, just for a moment.
Instead, let's have a look at her argument against cannabis. First important phrase I come to is that cannabis is a "stepping stone to heroin". Thousands of people smoke cannabis every day and I would really like to know how many of them move on to stronger stuff, drugs like heroin. I'm not privy to the statistics, but I'm willing to bet that the number is very low.
I believe that even if cannabis didn't exist, people would still get hooked on heroin. In fact, I'd go so far as saying that MORE people would, because there would be nothing lower to try instead.
Cannabis is illegal anyway, so the idea of making it more illegal, or handing out greater punishments for getting caught with it, seems pointless. People will still smoke it, regardless of the class.
And yes, medical research may have proved that it doubles the risk of mental health. But medical research has spoken often about the risk of cigarettes and alcohol. So either we ban both of these or the medical argument goes out the window, because both of these substances cause more than enough problems for people who abuse them.
And I think that is where the argument ultimately falls down. It fails to differentiate between people who use and people who abuse. Because it seems when drugs are debated, these two people become one.
People get hooked on drugs. They become addicted and they do bad things to get more drugs. But the important thing to understand is that this isn't every one's story. Taking drugs does not lead to becoming addicted to drugs, in the same way that drinking alcohol does not lead to becoming addicted to alcohol.
The truth is that cannabis is not as addictive as cigarettes, and that is a medical fact.
I think our problem is not the drugs themselves, but the knowledge that young people have about them. At schools, drugs are demonised. They are bad, they will kill you and that is the only way to look at them.
What this limited world view achieves is a very dangerous ignorance about drug use. The kids grow up and they see people take drugs. They see them having a good time and they see that drugs aren't killing them like they have been taught.
So what they have been taught is a lie, right? They decide to take drugs and because they have a good time as well, and because they don't die, they take more. They ignore the dangers because if adults lied about drugs being bad, then they can't have been that knowledgeable about them in the first place.
What is needed is a straight, truthful drug education. Drugs make you feel good. They really do. But, like alcohol, they have to be taken carefully. Take alcohol or drugs every day and you're going to screw yourself up.
And yes, now I'm completely off topic. I took a little detour and ended up following that bloody road for miles and now I'm away from Daily Mail woman and how much she has annoyed me.
And she has, with her narrow-minded view about people who take drugs. I would laugh at her, if I knew that people wouldn't read what she wrote and believe it. But sadly, a world of free speech means that people will read and will believe.
So hopefully someone, anyone, will read this and be swayed my way just a little bit.
:)
PS: This may come across as pro-drugs. It isn't. I'm just pro-choice.
What do I most value?
I value freedom and friendship over everything else. It is a sad state of affairs that we need money to gain real freedom, away from the 9-5 jobs and bills.
What do I most despise?
Very similar to what I hate, but I despise people who are ignorant; both intelligently ignorant and emotionally ignorant. People who don't look beyond their own perceptions, who don't seek to stand in someone else's shoes or to better themselves in any way.
You bore me. You are wasting a life that someone or something or just plain fate has given you. We are created to constantly raise the bar and better ourselves, and your path of least resistance approach means that I will never care for you.
Who are the people that matter to me and why?
My parents, because without them I am nothing. Literally, nothing!
My brother and sister and the step-ones in between. Mostly after Uni, because now I know that I am closer to them than I ever thought I was. No matter how annoying they are.
My old-school friends for the ease in which we can slip into conversation. It can be about nothing and mean everything. It is always reassuring to know that no matter how my life changes me, as long as they are still my friends, I must be doing something right.
My new-school friends for teaching me that life isn't my one experience and that other views exist. For showing me that people don't have to share the same taste in film, music or anything else to find some common ground and become friends.
What changes have happened to me and why?
Since when?
I've got taller, but not that tall. I've got more cynical, but still naive. I got more confident, but not enough. I've got smarter, but still have way too much to learn.
I know more about me and I know more about my friends. I've learnt more about the world but my opinion on it has stayed the same.
Also, I think I'm cuter.
:P
I awoke groggily and for a brief moment I didn't know where I was. I wasn't in my bed. I wasn't even in a bed. I was on the floor, in a sleeping bag. In two sleeping bags, as a matter of fact, but that does little to change the story. I was still wearing the clothes from the night before, except my coat which, I discovered later, was hung on the back of a chair.
Memories and facts and my life came flooding back to me. Of course I wasn't in my bed! I was 250 miles away, in Southampton. The floor I slept on belonged to Emma. The sleeping bag, indeed both of them, belonged to Emma. The house belonged to Emma if you ignore the fact that she has to rent from the real owner.
Emma herself was in her bed, where she should be. Next to her was Megan, technically also where she should have been, considering the fact she called shotgun on it the night before.
Both were awake and talking. What they were saying isn't important, only that they were piecing together the night before. Memories weren't in high supply on that bed. Fortunately, or unfortunately depending on how you see the memories, I remembered.
I clambered out of one sleeping bag, rolled it up and used is as a makeshift pillow. I briefly wonder why I didn't do this before, but I must have found a way to sleep, otherwise I wouldn't have started this with the words 'I awoke'.
My head feels achy. I shake it to see just how much it hurts. Not a lot, but I'm sure time will sort that out. My stomach makes noises that, if translated into English, would mean "What are you doing to me, silly boy?!"
And my stomach would be right. I had been just as cruel to it the night before. My first night in Southampton was celebrated with cans of cider and later, at a pub called 'The Hobbit', pints of cocktails. Whiskey and vodka and rum and cider and all manner of other spirits meant that after getting back home (Emma's) we were pretty damn tipsy and in possession of a stolen brick.
So we sat and talked. We ate bagels with cream cheese and ham. Faye, who I now realise hasn't been mentioned yet but who was also there, hijacked my blog. And in the early hours of the morning I must have passed out on the bed.
I awoke next to Emma a little later. I was fully dressed, half covered in a quilt and next to a cold wall. I was also faced with a dilemma. The sleeping bag I was supposed to be sleeping in was underneath Faye which meant, unless I was mean enough to wake her, I was to sleep next to Emma. However, unless I woke her, or at least risked it, I was going to be half-covered and cold.
Luckily, this problem was solved on my return from a toilet break, as Emma had moved just enough to allow me access to more quilt. So I clambered in and fell asleep.
I remained fully clothed though, because a) it was warmer and b) awaking in your boxers next to a girl is the outcome of a successful date and, as far as I was aware, this wasn't a date. Therefore awaking next to a girl in your boxers was a little odd and probably unnerving for the girl. I'm just a gentleman and one day it will be my downfall.
But anyway, I did make up for this night of gluttony by repenting the next day. I learnt stuff from magazines, I enjoyed a long, relaxing shower and I ate fish and peas which can only be said to be healthy.
But it seems I was only lulling my body into false security because it was less than twenty-four hours that I fell back off the wagon once again. Faye left and was replaced by Megan and the drinking began again.
I could regale you with a chronological list of what was drunk and you may be a little shocked. I could tell you what was done when, or close to when as alcohol has a habit of bending time to its will, but that would be boring to write and boring to read.
I will tell you that I met Gavin, a colleague of Emma's and Katie, a housemate of his. I'd like to be able to tell you more about them, but the only remembered fact is that they were nice.
I will tell you that it was only £5 entry to the club but only 50p for a pint, which tells you just how easy it was to get drunk in that place.
I'll say that there was a queue to the boy's toilet, a fact made even weirder because I was queued next to a man in a dinosaur costume. I may or may not have spoken to him.
Emma and Gavin "enjoyed each other's company" which was strangely both predictable and surprising at the same time.
With Megan and Katie, we travelled to Katie’s house after being abandoned by the happy couple. We sat on a bed, Megan wrote Gavin a note and we got a taxi back.
Megan asked the Asian Taxi driver if he was Irish.
And that was the important stuff to happen in the night.
We got back to Emma's and rang her, whilst Megan pressed repeatedly on the doorbell. Emma answered sleepily and told us she was going to "put us in her drawers" and never explained herself. It was left to her housemate, awoken by Megan's crazed doorbell ringing, to let us in.
We found Gavin passed out on the bed, fully clothed. Clearly, he follows the same code of boxer etiquette I do. He left, and Megan took his place (although she did briefly forget where the bed was and needed me to tell her) and we fell asleep. Well, Emma was already gone so she didn't have to fall anywhere.
And now we get back to the beginning of the story and also the end of the story. I explained what I have written above to Emma and Megan. There were gasps and "Did I really do that?" and "Oh, I sort of remember that" and then it was over. Some of it was remembered and most of it was forgotten, especially by Emma.
And now you know what they found out. Or you are them. Either way, now that I've told the story I'm going to do what I did after telling the same story then: Go back to sleep.
And by 'Go back to sleep' I mean go and do some work.
:D
It started with a staircase.
I was buying a book. It is something I do when I'm in need of a book to read. I've learnt that it is usually the most effective way of dealing with the problem.
There was a certain book I was searching for, recommended by a Russian girl. 'American Gods' by Neil Gaiman for those curious enough. I saw a sign saying 'General Fiction' and figured that since the book was both general and fiction, I'd almost certainly find it amongst these shelves. I didn't.
A brief question to an assistant and I was told that I could find the relevant book upstairs in the Science Fiction section. And here is where my rant begins.
Why am I forced to walk upstairs to buy a science fiction book?! I realise that they have to separate the books. I note that 'Crime Fiction' and 'Horror' were also separate sections. But science fiction was the only fiction section kept upstairs, with all the non-fiction stuff.
What makes Science Fiction such a thing of horror that it has to be hidden away from the general public? Are we really living in a world where people would rather read about murder and sex than about wizards and gods?
OK, maybe the trip upstairs wasn't so much of a big deal, but it got me thinking. The book segregation was just the tip of the iceberg. It was representative of the way geeks are treated in the outside world.
Why is it that people are afraid to say "I read comics" for fear that someone will sneer "Aren't they for kids?” usually someone whose only contact with the written word is the pizza takeaway menu that they regularly order from. You know, the type of person that is living proof the phrase 'survival of the fittest' died with the invention of the microwave.
It's okay to say you read 'Atonement' but not anything by Terry Pratchett because one is deemed high art. They both have words and both require the same amount of intellect. Why the difference?
Why is it deemed obsessive to watch something like 'Star Trek' religiously, but when the whole of the world is watching 'Lost', then you are a fool not to be in front of your TV each and every week?
So, at this point, I stand up from my cheap plastic chair to face the circle of people around me; a bizarro AA-esque meeting. I hold my head up high and say "My name is Chris. And I am a geek."
My name is Chris and I know the first and last names of the Serenity Crew.
My name is Chris and I could write a passionate essay on 'Why Greedo Shouldn't Have Shot First'.
My name is Chris and I collect comic books. I know that X-Men is a metaphor for persecution of people who are different, and that Spiderman plays to the idea that if we have power, is it our responsibility to use it to help people. But really, I just like reading about people who wear tights, fight crime and say witty lines. The metaphors are just a bonus.
My name is Chris and I still shed a tear when Buffy impales Angel and sends him to hell (Discovered this yesterday).
My name is Chris and I have spent days of my life trying to get better and better at Guitar Hero. And yes, I realise that I should just learn a real guitar, but the game rewards me with messages saying how much I rock.
My name is Chris and I know how to play 'Magic the Gathering' and 'Yu-Gi-Oh'.
My name is Chris and I once debated with an eight year old as to which Pokemon was better.
My name is Chris and yes, I have played Dungeons and Dragons. And loved it.
And I will stand proud. Because although I may have done all of these and a dozen other geeky things, I am no better or worse than anyone who hasn't.
I don't live in my parents’ basement. I wash daily. I'm not overweight. I go out mostly everyday and I meet people and I socialise. Girls only scare me the requisite amount that they should. I can talk about sport (a little), politics (a little) and gossip (too much). I function in society.
And I'm sure that there are hundreds like me; people who like science fiction and comics and videogames but look and act like everyone else that doesn't. We are not freaks and, therefore, we shouldn't be scorned.
And we shouldn't have to climb a staircase to get to our books!
:)
http://steiner0101.deviantart.com/art/SPIDERMAN-14894162
People are curious creatures. They come in all shapes and sizes. Some are loud. Some are quiet. All can change their volume depending on their surroundings.
People can live in a hot desert or in the cold waste of the North Pole. They can live on the highest mountains or survive at the depths of the oceans.
People can smile when they are hurting, cry when they are happy or laugh when they don't find a joke that funny.
People are unique and yet find comfort in similarities: same taste in film, music, food. They love company, yet sit apart from each other on public transport. They are weary of strangers, yet will offer services when someone is in need.
People are fascinating. You could lose hours of your life watching how they move, walk, talk, laugh, joke, cry, dance and just be.
But sometimes, usually when you want it the least, people suck!
And that is all I have to say.
:(